Skip to main content

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn.
In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University.

The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio.
The methodology behind HMC’s success is the application of what is known as Modern Portfolio Theory. Modern Portfolio Theory is a theory of finance that seeks to maximize portfolio returns by carefully allocating capital across multiple asset classes. Among those asset classes, Modern Portfolio Theory calls for 10% to 20% of a well-diversified portfolio to be allocated into hard real estate assets. Historical results show that strategy to be effective in posting above-market returns in both good and poor market conditions.

For example, fiscal 2015 was a challenging year for many investors as global markets reacted to falling oil prices and concerns of slowing growth in China. However, Harvard’s annual return of 5.8% outperformed a number of other benchmark indexes, and real estate played a leading role in boosting the endowment’s overall return for the year. Specifically, Harvard’s direct real estate investments posted the highest annual return of all portfolio asset classes at 19.4%, trouncing its second and third best performing asset classes, U.S. equity and private equity holdings, which returned 12.4% and 11.8% respectively.

Harvard Endowments 2016 Targeted Allocation
According to a letter from HMC President Stephen Blyth, Ph.D. in the endowment’s 2015 fiscal report, the real estate return of 19.4% was driven primarily by the “exceptional, continued success of a direct investment strategy started in 2010.“ In fiscal year 2015, the Harvard direct real estate program returned 35.5%, as our internal real estate team and their joint venture partners continued to create outstanding value throughout their portfolio,” stated Blyth. That performance reinforces the advantages that can be found by devoting a percentage of an investment portfolio to real estate assets. It also emphasizes the important distinction that exists between direct real estate investing versus other real estate investment options such as buying shares of publicly traded REIT stocks.

Asset allocation is the most fundamental strategic investment decision an investor can make, and even Blyth admits that it can be the most challenging. Those strategic asset allocation targets vary from investor to investor. HMC recently took a fresh look at its own strategy, and after considerable research and market analysis, in the 2015 Annual Report, HMC reconfirmed its commitment to real estate in 2016 with a target range of 10% to 17%.

As many Family Offices understand, success leaves clues, and a clue to investing into real estate can be seen from how Harvard invests into real estate within its endowment.

Comments

  1. So informative things are provided here, I really happy to read this post, I was just imagine about it and you provided me the correct information I really bookmark it, for further reading, So thanks for sharing the information.
    Real Estate Investment Classes

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Real Estate Analysis

Just a little while ago myself and my patriarch sat down with another family and began discussing real estate and our strategy.  As the family office really didn't understand real estate, they started to ask questions on how we looked at deals and evaluated opportunities. Thinking back I think that a lot of the questions came from the fact that they created their wealth in the LBO market and thus understood the different nuances of businesses.  Now many families created their wealth from a business but this particular family was involved in 39 different industries, thus I believe their frame of reference was a little different. Our family office created their wealth in real estate and one big part of that has to do with the degree of analytics that is used in our office.  In fact, I have been asking for about 10 years why people are not more analytical about real estate decisions.   All too often a family office is approached by real estate funds or operators because they work

So you want money from a family office huh?

A lot of people want to access the family office market . The reason is because they believe that it's an area which they can raise a lot of capital and often in a manner that is much easier. Although the check size might be bigger there's many many things that people don't realize when dealing with a family office.  In my past I had the ability to raise capital from individuals to family offices to private equity funds, insurance companies and institutions. The biggest difference with institutions or institutional capital is that their decisions are typically made based upon parameters. They have a box or boxes in which they are to invest into. In addition, it's not their own money so because of that they are often removed from any emotions. Sure they want to do a good job but let's face it its not their own money!!  Family offices, however are different. I would say that family office investors are much more like individual investors. In many ways very si