Skip to main content

CRE Distress is Still Out There................Lingering

Capital Scarcity Persists
There remains scheduled maturities in excess of $300 billion for each of the four years, 2014 through 2017. Most of this debt was underwritten during the peak of the last cycle from 2004 to 2007, when valuations were high and loan underwriting standards were loose, amortization disappeared and interest-only payment terms took its place. The majority of these loans are either under water (the loan is in excess of today's value of the property) or un-refinanceable, given today's lower asset valuations and more restrictive debt covenants. Additionally, a huge portion of the debt that matured during the 2009-2012 timeframe (per the graph below, in excess of $300 billion per year) has not yet been resolved. 

Maturities Catalyze opportunity


It has been "extended and pretended" and still awaits recapitalization and resolution. In other words, the majority of the problem in CRE is still to be solved and the majority of the distress is still out there, lingering.

Because of this it is believed that this overhang of unresolved problems restrains CRE asset price appreciation and creates an opportunistic environment where current CRE owners are only very gradually having their day of reckoning, where they are forced to take painful write-downs or write-offs, as the rescue and refinancing capital is still too scarce and costly. The economy has simply not rebounded quickly enough or robustly enough to bail most of these overextended borrowers out of their positions.

Debt capital formation remains far below peak levels; and although interest rates are low, loan re-financing proceeds levels are insufficient to plug the balance sheet holes created by lower asset values. During the peak years of the last cycle, the CMBS market became, quite clearly, the "dumb money" in the CRE marketplace. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn. In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University. The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio. The methodology behind HMC’s success i...
1 comment
Read more

Real Estate Analysis

Just a little while ago myself and my patriarch sat down with another family and began discussing real estate and our strategy.  As the family office really didn't understand real estate, they started to ask questions on how we looked at deals and evaluated opportunities. Thinking back I think that a lot of the questions came from the fact that they created their wealth in the LBO market and thus understood the different nuances of businesses.  Now many families created their wealth from a business but this particular family was involved in 39 different industries, thus I believe their frame of reference was a little different. Our family office created their wealth in real estate and one big part of that has to do with the degree of analytics that is used in our office.  In fact, I have been asking for about 10 years why people are not more analytical about real estate decisions.   All too often a family office is approached by rea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Real Estate - The Bedrock Asset for Family Offices

Global Family Office Report 2015: Largest Family Office Research Study undertaken offers insight into family office investments in real estate  The average family office portfolio allocates approximately 13% to real estate, and there is a home bias in holdings according to The Global Family Office Report 2015, produced by Campden Wealth Research, in partnership with UBS.  The average family office, with assets under management of USD 806 million, invested approximately USD 105 million in real estate activity in 2014, be it in residential or commercial real estate.  Family offices prefer to invest locally or nationally for both commercial and residential property. Since real estate direct investment typically takes place in-house, this may be a reflection of the local knowledge and skill set of the staff. Where investments are made further afield, they are made with the expectations of higher returns, with international or regional investments coming with signi...
Post a Comment
Read more