Skip to main content

CRE Distress is Still Out There................Lingering

Capital Scarcity Persists
There remains scheduled maturities in excess of $300 billion for each of the four years, 2014 through 2017. Most of this debt was underwritten during the peak of the last cycle from 2004 to 2007, when valuations were high and loan underwriting standards were loose, amortization disappeared and interest-only payment terms took its place. The majority of these loans are either under water (the loan is in excess of today's value of the property) or un-refinanceable, given today's lower asset valuations and more restrictive debt covenants. Additionally, a huge portion of the debt that matured during the 2009-2012 timeframe (per the graph below, in excess of $300 billion per year) has not yet been resolved. 

Maturities Catalyze opportunity


It has been "extended and pretended" and still awaits recapitalization and resolution. In other words, the majority of the problem in CRE is still to be solved and the majority of the distress is still out there, lingering.

Because of this it is believed that this overhang of unresolved problems restrains CRE asset price appreciation and creates an opportunistic environment where current CRE owners are only very gradually having their day of reckoning, where they are forced to take painful write-downs or write-offs, as the rescue and refinancing capital is still too scarce and costly. The economy has simply not rebounded quickly enough or robustly enough to bail most of these overextended borrowers out of their positions.

Debt capital formation remains far below peak levels; and although interest rates are low, loan re-financing proceeds levels are insufficient to plug the balance sheet holes created by lower asset values. During the peak years of the last cycle, the CMBS market became, quite clearly, the "dumb money" in the CRE marketplace. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn. In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University. The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio. The methodology behind HMC’s success is th
1 comment
Read more

Buffett’s Three-Step Rule of Focus for Success

To set you on the right course, take a coaching lesson from Buffett himself. He once walked his personal pilot through a life-changing exercise in goal-setting that's since become popular in productivity and career circles. It's a simple, three-step process to set boundaries, say no to distractions, and home in on success. It goes like this: 1. Write down a list of your top 25 career goals. 2. Circle the five most important goals that truly speak to you. These are your most urgent goals. Now here's the real kicker. 3. Completely eliminate the other 20 goals you have listed. Just cross them off, despite if they
Post a Comment
Read more