Skip to main content

Real Estate - The Bedrock Asset for Family Offices

Global Family Office Report 2015: Largest Family Office Research Study undertaken offers insight into family office investments in real estate 


The average family office portfolio allocates approximately 13% to real estate, and there is a home bias in holdings according to The Global Family Office Report 2015, produced by Campden Wealth Research, in partnership with UBS. 

The average family office, with assets under management of USD 806 million, invested approximately USD 105 million in real estate activity in 2014, be it in residential or commercial real estate. 

Family offices prefer to invest locally or nationally for both commercial and residential property. Since real estate direct investment typically takes place in-house, this may be a reflection of the local knowledge and skill set of the staff. Where investments are made further afield, they are made with the expectations of higher returns, with international or regional investments coming with significant premiums attached, equating to an additional 2% return on investment per annum. 

The Global Family Office Report 2015 surveyed principals and executives in over 224 family offices (based in 37 different countries), with an average size of USD 806 million assets under management. Collectively, the participating family offices represented well over USD 200 billion in private wealth. 

“The higher investment returns expected for more far-flung property, is attributable to the higher costs and outsourcing requirements for investing in an unfamiliar environment,” explains Stuart Rutherford, Director of Research at Campden Wealth. 

Real estate remains a key holding for family offices. Philip Higson, Vice Chairman, Global Family Office Group, UBS AG notes: “Investments in real estate direct investment are truly the bedrock of family office portfolios. It also is noteworthy that this year’s research found that both beneficiary engagement, and the presence of an operating business, lead to increased allocations to real estate.” 

The data also reveals an ongoing affinity among family office for residential property, the result of past experience and the emotional appeal of family homes. Two-fifths (42%) of real estate direct investment by family offices is in the form of residential property – be this for their own use or as an investment on a buy-to-let basis. 

Stuart Rutherford, Director of Research at Campden Wealth highlighted the unique role real estate plays for family offices: 

“Not only does real estate provide a consistent return for family offices, it was a major contributor to the 6.1% return that the average family office made in 2014. Typically seen as more of a conservative asset holding, the muted performance of equities and other asset classes made real estate investment stand out.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn. In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University. The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio. The methodology behind HMC’s success is th

So you want money from a family office huh?

A lot of people want to access the family office market . The reason is because they believe that it's an area which they can raise a lot of capital and often in a manner that is much easier. Although the check size might be bigger there's many many things that people don't realize when dealing with a family office.  In my past I had the ability to raise capital from individuals to family offices to private equity funds, insurance companies and institutions. The biggest difference with institutions or institutional capital is that their decisions are typically made based upon parameters. They have a box or boxes in which they are to invest into. In addition, it's not their own money so because of that they are often removed from any emotions. Sure they want to do a good job but let's face it its not their own money!!  Family offices, however are different. I would say that family office investors are much more like individual investors. In many ways very si

WHY AREN’T FAMILY OFFICES INVESTING INTO OPPORTUNITY ZONES?

In a study that I did at the beginning of this year, I asked over 100 family offices what their plans were for investing in opportunity zones.  The results were staggering.  17% said they were going to invest into an opportunity zone deal, the remainder reported no or maybe.   Now at the time, the regulations were not out, so that was a huge reason for many families to be sitting on the sideline, but now that they are out why are these numbers still holding up?   Well, I think there are a few reasons.  The first is I don’t think there is a distinct understanding of the nuances of opportunity zones by family offices.   I have spoken on this topic so much, or written articles or been interviewed on shows and podcasts and I have an excellent understanding of what these include and the benefits, but there are still nuances I don’t understand exactly.  One of the things that come up in sales is if something is hard to understand the person you are sitting across from won't buy.  I bel