Skip to main content

The deals that show you that the property cycle is in full swing

The following blog is from my partner at usfamilyofficerealestate.com.  Akhil Patel from the firm Ascendant Strategy (www.theascendantstrategy.com) explains why the following deals show that the property cycle is in full swing.


In July 2015, German lender, Commerzbank, sold two commercial real estate portfolios for around $2.9 billion.

It’s not a particularly remarkable story but I am bringing it to your attention because it’s an important part of the 18 year cycle, particularly the first half of the cycle – the de-leveraging process.

US funds have been in the vanguard of this process. Having snapped up loan portfolios from US banks in the wake of the 2008/09 financial crisis, they are doing the same in Europe following the Eurozone crisis. The strong dollar gives them additional firepower as well.

Note some of the key facts in the article – all classic elements of the cycle:

  •         The bank had to be bailed out by the German government with an $18.2 billion emergency investment at the height of the financial crisis in 2008/09.
  •      The bank is selling off part of its commercial real estate loan book, which it describes as “non-core” assets – compared to its “core” ones – which are the loans it supplies to businesses looking to expand, invest, create jobs do all of the things that generate economic growth
  •         This will help the Bank meet new banking regulatory requirements (Basel III) under which the Bank needs to hold more capital relative to its assets. It recently raised $1.4 billion by issuing more shares to further meet such requirements.
  • ·         Note that the discount (that is the amount by which the sale price is below the outstanding value of the loans) on the portfolios being sold is only 3% – this is significant because this means that the value of the real estate has recovered to levels seen when the loans were made, prior to the financial crisis.


Pay attention to articles like these. You don’t see them every day but this is the property cycle in action.

Banks can only really start to lend to the economy properly once they have got rid of the loans they made in the prior cycle. It takes several years for banks to do this, because they need to see a recovery in the underlying value of the real estate so that they minimize losses and because they have a lot of real estate on their books.

And they have to find buyers – the more the better to generate competition and increase the sale price (which also takes time). Many of these assets are now being snapped up by other banks and institutional investors.

It is only once this unwinding/de-leveraging process has completed that banks can focus on their “core” activities, which is lending to businesses that generate wealth within the economy. The article notes that Commerzbank is a “key lender to the small and midsized companies that make up the backbone of Germany’s economy”. Such companies innovate, create jobs and drive economic growth.

Only when such companies start finding credit easier to obtain does the next cycle gets fully underway.

This means that the “recovery” – in the United States and in Europe - so far has really only got us back to the starting blocks. The race will start now and run into the middle of the next decade.

As an investor you should be identifying those smart deals and going for it.


But you need to do so by understanding how the 18 year real estate cycle works. You can read more about that here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn. In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University. The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio. The methodology behind HMC’s success is th

Real Estate Analysis

Just a little while ago myself and my patriarch sat down with another family and began discussing real estate and our strategy.  As the family office really didn't understand real estate, they started to ask questions on how we looked at deals and evaluated opportunities. Thinking back I think that a lot of the questions came from the fact that they created their wealth in the LBO market and thus understood the different nuances of businesses.  Now many families created their wealth from a business but this particular family was involved in 39 different industries, thus I believe their frame of reference was a little different. Our family office created their wealth in real estate and one big part of that has to do with the degree of analytics that is used in our office.  In fact, I have been asking for about 10 years why people are not more analytical about real estate decisions.   All too often a family office is approached by real estate funds or operators because they work

So you want money from a family office huh?

A lot of people want to access the family office market . The reason is because they believe that it's an area which they can raise a lot of capital and often in a manner that is much easier. Although the check size might be bigger there's many many things that people don't realize when dealing with a family office.  In my past I had the ability to raise capital from individuals to family offices to private equity funds, insurance companies and institutions. The biggest difference with institutions or institutional capital is that their decisions are typically made based upon parameters. They have a box or boxes in which they are to invest into. In addition, it's not their own money so because of that they are often removed from any emotions. Sure they want to do a good job but let's face it its not their own money!!  Family offices, however are different. I would say that family office investors are much more like individual investors. In many ways very si