Skip to main content

WHO IS INVESTING INTO OPPORTUNITY ZONES

In my last two blogs, I went through why family offices are not investing in opportunity zones…………….at least to the extent that everyone thought they would be.   So who are the ones who are investing in these real estate opportunities?  That is the institutions and the high net worth individuals.   But I see a problem coming down the road with these high net worth investors.    I don’t think they know what is coming down the pike in the next seven years.  Let me give you an example.   So I have $500K in capital gains that I invest.  Well, in year 5, 10% of my capital gains are forgiven.  In another two years another 5%.  So in total, 15% is forgiven on the $500K, which is a total of 75K.   So now I am left with a tax bill of $425K.  So where is that money going to come from for them to pay the taxes????  Remember these are high net worth investors, not family office type capital.   Now some sponsors say “well we will refinance and they will be able to use that money”   Well let's say that doesn’t happen…….now what???   I suspect that many of these investors, and I think a majority of them will not have the money to pay this tax bill.  Then what?   Well, that is where I see them coming after the sponsors because for sure there will be lawyers lining up to file class-action lawsuits saying “they didn’t understand” (which personally is a whole another topic that I feel strongly about.), but this will happen.  I don’t think the sponsors see it coming either but when there was a downturn which was coming after the sponsors?   The retail clients, high net worth clients, not the family offices, and the number of lawsuits were considerable.   You heard it here; first, there will be issues when it comes time to pay the taxes by high net worth investors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harvard's Endowment commits to a target investment range into real estate between 10% to 17% for 2016

Years ago, before the downturn I was paying very close attention to the investing allocation of my Alma Maters Endowments Investing Strategy HMC (Harvard Management Company), especially in the area of real estate.  I believe that not only was Harvard a great place to understand the importance of investment allocation strategies before the downturn but even more so since the downturn. In fact, investors who are looking to enhance the performance of their investment portfolios probably won’t find a better investment model than the one used by the $37.6 billion endowment for Harvard University. The entity in charge of managing the endowment, Harvard Management Company (HMC), has accrued an impressive investment track record across its 41-year history. As of fiscal year 2015, the endowment had produced an average annual return of 12.2% – 290 basis points higher than the average 9.3% return of a typical U.S. 60/40 stock and bond portfolio. The methodology behind HMC’s success i...

Buffett’s Three-Step Rule of Focus for Success

To set you on the right course, take a coaching lesson from Buffett himself. He once walked his personal pilot through a life-changing exercise in goal-setting that's since become popular in productivity and career circles. It's a simple, three-step process to set boundaries, say no to distractions, and home in on success. It goes like this: 1. Write down a list of your top 25 career goals. 2. Circle the five most important goals that truly speak to you. These are your most urgent goals. Now here's the real kicker. 3. Completely eliminate the other 20 goals you have listed. Just cross them off, despite if they ...

CRE Distress is Still Out There................Lingering

Capital Scarcity Persists T here remains scheduled maturities in excess of $300 billion for each of the four years, 2014 through 2017. Most of this debt was underwritten during the peak of the last cycle from 2004 to 2007, when valuations were high and loan underwriting standards were loose, amortization disappeared and interest-only payment terms took its place. The majority of these loans are either under water (the loan is in excess of today's value of the property) or un-refinanceable, given today's lower asset valuations and more restrictive debt covenants. Additionally, a huge portion of the debt that matured during the 2009-2012 timeframe (per the graph below, in excess of $300 billion per year) has not yet been resolved.   Maturities Catalyze opportunity It has been "extended and pretended" and still awaits recapitalization and resolution. In other words,   the majority of the problem in CRE is still to be solved and the majority of the distre...